search instagram arrow-down

Copyright Notice

© rauldukeblog and The Violent Ink 2017. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to The Violent Ink and rauldukeblog The Violent Ink with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.


A Funny thing happened on the way to the Election.

“-Henry, I’m ashamed of you. You don’t half thank the good gentleman. May I do it for you?’
-Indeed you shall, dear, if you can improve it. Let us see you try.
She walked to my man, got up in his lap, put her arm round his neck, and kissed him right on the mouth. Then the two old gentlemen shouted with laughter, but I was dumfounded, just petrified, as you may say.”

— Mark Twain, The Million Pound Bank Note


“The party is obvious. The casualties inevitable.”

— Lester Bangs



Last week, because of a looming soul migraine, and having nothing better to do, we spent a few minutes listening to David Pakman.

Pakman in full tepid earnest mode, was asking (sort) of questions about the cost of Universal Healthcare.

For fun (a relative notion) we posted a question: There are around 2 million people who work in the private insurance industry.

What happens to them when the government phases their jobs out of existence?

And what happens to their dependents?

And what happens to the people who in some way are dependent on how and where the insurance employees spend their money?

In other words, while universal healthcare is the correct idea and along with education, housing and food, should be defined as a human right, the transition will dig a large hole in the middle of the economy.

The obvious assumption is that since Warren and Sanders can do math and probably are smart enough to hire people who can do math, they understand this and would if asked, say something along the lines of: we will retrain these people and or transition them to new jobs.

Well, they would say that wouldn’t they?

Because of course they can’t say we’ll dump them at the curb with some used IKEA furniture.

The problem(s) is that the government’s track record in this area is at best bad and abysmal at worst.

The tech revolution was of course a classic capitalist paradigm in which rich people got richer, previously not poor people got richer, and people who use your debt as currency increased your level of debt, and millions were fucked and sent to live in a ring of hell defined by any number of Springsteen songs about the post industrial waste land.

None of which means universal healthcare is wrong.

It just means it’s more complicated than what can fit on a bumper sticker.

But because Sanders and Warren employ people to watch Pakman, TYT and Sam Seder and god help them, Kyle Kulinski, a low level elf saw the question and passed it up the food chain.

And on it went until it was dropped on the right desk and yesterday at an event Sanders and Warren responded.

In Sanders’ case the news is being presented as if he answered the wrong question.

We have a hunch that’s possible but what’s more likely is that Bernie took an opportunity to respond as politicians are trained to do, to answer the question they wish they had been asked not the one you asked.

At the same time Warren pointed out that her plan (of course she has a plan for that) has already addressed that issue and – surprise – her plan calls for people working in the private insurance industry to be transitioned to new jobs and yada yada yada.

Again, not wrong but to borrow a concept, plans never survive first contact with the enemy.

They get the internet on Wall Street and they can do math as well.

The problem with Warren and Sanders (et al) is as we’ve pointed out, not that they are wrong but that their opponents range from people with political views slightly to the right of Francisco Franco and others with the ethics of a Medici pope with a hangover and unexplained stains on their miter.

While obviously better than the malignant troll current squatting over the country the fact remains Warren and Sanders are liberals and Sanders, despite his left wing rhetoric, is not only Eugene Debs 2.0, he’s Debs with a heart that might explode and he’s almost 80.

And even if that were not true, the goons and fascists will create one crisis after another to prevent a transition from succeeding.

As this weeks SNL cold open had it, in spoofing Warren and her UHC plan, step one is cutting the military budget and so the joke goes: Therefore, dead on arrival.

Edward Snowden speaking 2 weeks ago to Jeff Spicoli’s  smarter cousin, Joe Rogan, said that whoever gets elected will be “read in” and be presented by the spooks with all the most terrifying secret details of what’s going on – including, he added – things that are fabrications or exaggerated but also includes things that are authentic and will scare the piss out of them.

And the result is, Sanders/Warren say fuck, go away and do what you need to do so if anything goes wrong, it’s not my fault because the Mid-terms are in 18 months and we have to raise elevnty billion dollars.

And social media warriors can bloviate all they want about how Bernie will kick Military Industrial Complex ass with a copy of the constitution in one hand and the collected works of Chomsky in the other, but history says otherwise.

And then there’s the gerrymandered House and Senate, the corrupt courts, the free range ex special forces goons for hire employed by billionaires both at home and abroad (think Harvey Weinstein was the only rich guy with a private army of ex special forces and spooks?) who will be used to stage “events” like the metaphoric burning of the  Reichstag, (or countering Sanders/Warren by crashing the Mexican Peso, or the national bank of Spain, or Brazil or leveraging shares in a major set of Hedge Funds in England while it wobbles into a post Brexit delirium).

After all George Soros made a fortune back in the 90s in exactly that manner (by betting against the pound) and recently Corbyn, in one of his rare moments of standing upright, said he would if elected PM, go after Britain’s wealthiest who, he correctly pointed out, had made money by betting against the Pound.

And England’s uber wealthy have responded by announcing they and their money will, in a we are not amused regal huff, leave for Monaco or Switzerland.

And of course then there’s debt.

Poor people have debt.

Rich people use debt as money.

They buy and sell it.

It is a chain around the neck of the permanent underclass of wage slaves.

Warren and Sanders correctly want to wipe out student debt.

As we’ve pointed out, when they try, the people who stand to lose trillions will create a debt crisis elsewhere because if you really are serious about eliminating student debt then you would have to nationalize the banks at the same time.

And that’s a revolution.

With violence.

And no, we’re not any more in favor of violence than we are in favor of earthquakes but we’re aware that they occur.

Not one example exists of major social change occurring without violence both against the establishment and by the establishment against the forces demanding change.

We’re certainly happy the question landed on the right desk.

We’re less than thrilled that the answer is the echo of a rusty can bouncing off the walls of an empty historical quarry.

But something about beggars and choosers.

The crash at this point is inevitable.

What comes out of it is anyone’s guess.




2 comments on “A Funny thing happened on the way to the Election.

  1. The point you make about the insurance industry is the same basic point I made about the agricultural and defense industries. There is no way to change one part of it without rattling many cages and maybe shaking some foundations. One thing affects the next and on down the line. And once it got rolling, it would be impossible to stop.

    It has revolutionary implications and possibly dangerous consequences, at least dangerous to the system and to those who rule over it and benefit from it, but also dangerous to all of us as the dominoes begin falling. Many innocent bystanders will be casualties, in one way or another, if not from direct violence then from general crisis and maybe breakdown.

    There is no reforming the system. Any attempt at reform is inevitably revolutionary. It can’t be avoided. Politics right now is a game of Jenga. No one quite knows pulling out which block might send the whole thing toppling. So, out of fear, those rigging the game will try to stop any blocks being pulled out at all. For certain, the likes of Sanders and Warren won’t dare to threaten the system, no matter what they promise.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. rauldukeblog says:

      In a sense revolutionary crises are a natural phenom – as you pointe dpout previously regarding the origin of the waord “revolution.”

      We have an integrated system.

      Warren/Sanders probably know this but then again they are in many respects forest for the trees thinkers.

      Their insistence on addressing “student debt” is a prime example.

      Sounds great and logical but “student debt” is a hundred interconnected systems.

      Big Ag and Defense are another illustration of the system and the dilemma.

      We’re clearly in a damned if you do damned if you don’t historical moment.

      Can’t do nothing and doing just about anything will produce crisis.

      To radically change the food system from production to transport to consumption is like packing up California and moving it to Japan.

      But doing nothing is pure dytopia.

      doing what’s required runs the risk of dystopia but all but means some sort of socio-political upheaval of a revolutionary nature with all that implies.

      My current favorite example of this is the whole “Greta Thurnberg” cult.

      Yes, the environment is in crisis but what’s the actual plan?

      Barking at the diplomatic goons at the UN is useless.

      One day protests are useless.

      To take one example: climate crisis is the Vatican.

      As in, birth control.

      Thurnberg v the Pope.

      I’m not optimistic.

      Scientists (around 10, 000 of them) just released a report and it included birth control/population control as an issue vis the environment.

      200,000 thousand people a day for birth is not sustainable but how to get people to use contraceptives in places dominated by religious cults without starting a war which will destroy the environment?

      Haven’t heard Greta explain that one.

      Or anyone else in the public eye.

      As you say, a game of Jenga.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: